summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorXin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>2020-05-25 13:53:37 +0800
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2020-06-03 08:12:12 +0200
commit0a2442b0efc623c8db175116efc74f2e6c79190b (patch)
tree89fe5d6a4e6572f4f421af93a089076e959eed11
parent9e9c5c06b18bc585ad8ddb1f5d24b1ec13335deb (diff)
xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list
commit ed17b8d377eaf6b4a01d46942b4c647378a79bdd upstream. This waring can be triggered simply by: # ip xfrm policy update src 192.168.1.1/24 dst 192.168.1.2/24 dir in \ priority 1 mark 0 mask 0x10 #[1] # ip xfrm policy update src 192.168.1.1/24 dst 192.168.1.2/24 dir in \ priority 2 mark 0 mask 0x1 #[2] # ip xfrm policy update src 192.168.1.1/24 dst 192.168.1.2/24 dir in \ priority 2 mark 0 mask 0x10 #[3] Then dmesg shows: [ ] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7265 at net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1548 [ ] RIP: 0010:xfrm_policy_insert_list+0x2f2/0x1030 [ ] Call Trace: [ ] xfrm_policy_inexact_insert+0x85/0xe50 [ ] xfrm_policy_insert+0x4ba/0x680 [ ] xfrm_add_policy+0x246/0x4d0 [ ] xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x331/0x5c0 [ ] netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350 [ ] xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x66/0x80 [ ] netlink_unicast+0x439/0x630 [ ] netlink_sendmsg+0x714/0xbf0 [ ] sock_sendmsg+0xe2/0x110 The issue was introduced by Commit 7cb8a93968e3 ("xfrm: Allow inserting policies with matching mark and different priorities"). After that, the policies [1] and [2] would be able to be added with different priorities. However, policy [3] will actually match both [1] and [2]. Policy [1] was matched due to the 1st 'return true' in xfrm_policy_mark_match(), and policy [2] was matched due to the 2nd 'return true' in there. It caused WARN_ON() in xfrm_policy_insert_list(). This patch is to fix it by only (the same value and priority) as the same policy in xfrm_policy_mark_match(). Thanks to Yuehaibing, we could make this fix better. v1->v2: - check policy->mark.v == pol->mark.v only without mask. Fixes: 7cb8a93968e3 ("xfrm: Allow inserting policies with matching mark and different priorities") Reported-by: Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c7
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 3a33d0b98005..e62d4819089c 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -740,12 +740,7 @@ static void xfrm_policy_requeue(struct xfrm_policy *old,
static bool xfrm_policy_mark_match(struct xfrm_policy *policy,
struct xfrm_policy *pol)
{
- u32 mark = policy->mark.v & policy->mark.m;
-
- if (policy->mark.v == pol->mark.v && policy->mark.m == pol->mark.m)
- return true;
-
- if ((mark & pol->mark.m) == pol->mark.v &&
+ if (policy->mark.v == pol->mark.v &&
policy->priority == pol->priority)
return true;