diff options
| author | David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> | 2013-01-03 17:52:07 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> | 2013-01-28 09:49:15 +0000 |
| commit | d4e0bfec9b6fbb9b58640b44e01bb74ae0d29b22 (patch) | |
| tree | 255f31601ba4745162979ae0cfe80530d60900ac | |
| parent | 949db153b6466c6f7cad5a427ecea94985927311 (diff) | |
GFS2: fix skip unlock condition
The recent commit fb6791d100d1bba20b5cdbc4912e1f7086ec60f8
included the wrong logic. The lvbptr check was incorrectly
added after the patch was tested.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c b/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c index b906ed17a839..9802de0f85e6 100644 --- a/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c +++ b/fs/gfs2/lock_dlm.c @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl) { struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = gl->gl_sbd; struct lm_lockstruct *ls = &sdp->sd_lockstruct; + int lvb_needs_unlock = 0; int error; if (gl->gl_lksb.sb_lkid == 0) { @@ -294,8 +295,12 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl) gfs2_update_request_times(gl); /* don't want to skip dlm_unlock writing the lvb when lock is ex */ + + if (gl->gl_lksb.sb_lvbptr && (gl->gl_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE)) + lvb_needs_unlock = 1; + if (test_bit(SDF_SKIP_DLM_UNLOCK, &sdp->sd_flags) && - gl->gl_lksb.sb_lvbptr && (gl->gl_state != LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE)) { + !lvb_needs_unlock) { gfs2_glock_free(gl); return; } |