summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/nfs/objlayout
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>2012-08-02 15:38:23 +0300
committerTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>2012-08-02 17:42:51 -0400
commit7de6e28417c65919cf2c1621841a650c4a3afbbd (patch)
tree2dce28c9c8163082ce111e42ff902879ddb8a53c /fs/nfs/objlayout
parentf6166384095b7ecf77752b5e9096e6d03d75f7ae (diff)
pnfs-obj: Better IO pattern in case of unaligned offset
Depending on layout and ARCH, ORE has some limits on max IO sizes which is communicated on (what else) ore_layout->max_io_length, which is always stripe aligned. This was considered as the pg_test boundary for splitting and starting a new IO. But in the case of a long IO where the start offset is not aligned what would happen is that both end of IO[N] and start of IO[N+1] would be unaligned, causing each IO boundary parity unit to be calculated and written twice. So what we do in this patch is split the very start of an unaligned IO, up to a stripe boundary, and then next IO's can continue fully aligned til the end. We might be sacrificing the case where the full unaligned IO would fit within a single max_io_length, but the sacrifice is well worth the elimination of double calculation and parity units IO. Actually the sacrificing is marginal and is almost unmeasurable. TODO: If we know the total expected linear segment that will be received, at pg_init, we could use that information in many places: 1. blocks-layout get_layout write segment size 2. Better mds-threshold 3. In above situation for a better clean split I will do this in future submission. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfs/objlayout')
-rw-r--r--fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c55
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c
index f50d3e8d6f22..ea6d111b03e9 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c
@@ -570,17 +570,66 @@ static bool objio_pg_test(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio,
return false;
return pgio->pg_count + req->wb_bytes <=
- OBJIO_LSEG(pgio->pg_lseg)->layout.max_io_length;
+ (unsigned long)pgio->pg_layout_private;
+}
+
+void objio_init_read(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio, struct nfs_page *req)
+{
+ pnfs_generic_pg_init_read(pgio, req);
+ if (unlikely(pgio->pg_lseg == NULL))
+ return; /* Not pNFS */
+
+ pgio->pg_layout_private = (void *)
+ OBJIO_LSEG(pgio->pg_lseg)->layout.max_io_length;
+}
+
+static bool aligned_on_raid_stripe(u64 offset, struct ore_layout *layout,
+ unsigned long *stripe_end)
+{
+ u32 stripe_off;
+ unsigned stripe_size;
+
+ if (layout->raid_algorithm == PNFS_OSD_RAID_0)
+ return true;
+
+ stripe_size = layout->stripe_unit *
+ (layout->group_width - layout->parity);
+
+ div_u64_rem(offset, stripe_size, &stripe_off);
+ if (!stripe_off)
+ return true;
+
+ *stripe_end = stripe_size - stripe_off;
+ return false;
+}
+
+void objio_init_write(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio, struct nfs_page *req)
+{
+ unsigned long stripe_end = 0;
+
+ pnfs_generic_pg_init_write(pgio, req);
+ if (unlikely(pgio->pg_lseg == NULL))
+ return; /* Not pNFS */
+
+ if (req->wb_offset ||
+ !aligned_on_raid_stripe(req->wb_index * PAGE_SIZE,
+ &OBJIO_LSEG(pgio->pg_lseg)->layout,
+ &stripe_end)) {
+ pgio->pg_layout_private = (void *)stripe_end;
+ } else {
+ pgio->pg_layout_private = (void *)
+ OBJIO_LSEG(pgio->pg_lseg)->layout.max_io_length;
+ }
}
static const struct nfs_pageio_ops objio_pg_read_ops = {
- .pg_init = pnfs_generic_pg_init_read,
+ .pg_init = objio_init_read,
.pg_test = objio_pg_test,
.pg_doio = pnfs_generic_pg_readpages,
};
static const struct nfs_pageio_ops objio_pg_write_ops = {
- .pg_init = pnfs_generic_pg_init_write,
+ .pg_init = objio_init_write,
.pg_test = objio_pg_test,
.pg_doio = pnfs_generic_pg_writepages,
};