diff options
| author | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> | 2014-07-21 18:49:14 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> | 2014-09-03 14:58:17 -0700 |
| commit | a4412fc9486ec85686c6c7929e7e829f62ae377e (patch) | |
| tree | a267720d880085452257406ecf6f672ec8cbdbf9 /include/linux | |
| parent | 70c8038dd698b44daf7c8fc7e2eca142bec694c4 (diff) | |
seccomp,x86,arm,mips,s390: Remove nr parameter from secure_computing
The secure_computing function took a syscall number parameter, but
it only paid any attention to that parameter if seccomp mode 1 was
enabled. Rather than coming up with a kludge to get the parameter
to work in mode 2, just remove the parameter.
To avoid churn in arches that don't have seccomp filters (and may
not even support syscall_get_nr right now), this leaves the
parameter in secure_computing_strict, which is now a real function.
For ARM, this is a bit ugly due to the fact that ARM conditionally
supports seccomp filters. Fixing that would probably only be a
couple of lines of code, but it should be coordinated with the audit
maintainers.
This will be a slight slowdown on some arches. The right fix is to
pass in all of seccomp_data instead of trying to make just the
syscall nr part be fast.
This is a prerequisite for making two-phase seccomp work cleanly.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/seccomp.h | 21 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/seccomp.h b/include/linux/seccomp.h index 5d586a45a319..aa3c040230be 100644 --- a/include/linux/seccomp.h +++ b/include/linux/seccomp.h @@ -27,19 +27,17 @@ struct seccomp { struct seccomp_filter *filter; }; -extern int __secure_computing(int); -static inline int secure_computing(int this_syscall) +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER +extern int __secure_computing(void); +static inline int secure_computing(void) { if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SECCOMP))) - return __secure_computing(this_syscall); + return __secure_computing(); return 0; } - -/* A wrapper for architectures supporting only SECCOMP_MODE_STRICT. */ -static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall) -{ - BUG_ON(secure_computing(this_syscall) != 0); -} +#else +extern void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall); +#endif extern long prctl_get_seccomp(void); extern long prctl_set_seccomp(unsigned long, char __user *); @@ -56,8 +54,11 @@ static inline int seccomp_mode(struct seccomp *s) struct seccomp { }; struct seccomp_filter { }; -static inline int secure_computing(int this_syscall) { return 0; } +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER +static inline int secure_computing(void) { return 0; } +#else static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall) { return; } +#endif static inline long prctl_get_seccomp(void) { |