diff options
author | Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2008-11-12 23:39:10 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2008-11-12 23:39:10 -0800 |
commit | 524ad0a79126efabf58d0a49eace6155ab5b4549 (patch) | |
tree | 927e79d7d28d2c563c5beba74f06527df564e31c /net/atm/lec.c | |
parent | 8f15ea42b64941001a401cf855a0869e24f3a845 (diff) |
netdevice: safe convert to netdev_priv() #part-4
We have some reasons to kill netdev->priv:
1. netdev->priv is equal to netdev_priv().
2. netdev_priv() wraps the calculation of netdev->priv's offset, obviously
netdev_priv() is more flexible than netdev->priv.
But we cann't kill netdev->priv, because so many drivers reference to it
directly.
This patch is a safe convert for netdev->priv to netdev_priv(netdev).
Since all of the netdev->priv is only for read.
But it is too big to be sent in one mail.
I split it to 4 parts and make every part smaller than 100,000 bytes,
which is max size allowed by vger.
Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/atm/lec.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/atm/lec.c | 34 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/net/atm/lec.c b/net/atm/lec.c index 1def62d17739..e5e301550e8a 100644 --- a/net/atm/lec.c +++ b/net/atm/lec.c @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static void lec_handle_bridge(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) buff += 4; mesg->content.normal.flag = *buff & 0x01; /* 0x01 is topology change */ - priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev->priv; + priv = netdev_priv(dev); atm_force_charge(priv->lecd, skb2->truesize); sk = sk_atm(priv->lecd); skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb2); @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static unsigned char *get_tr_dst(unsigned char *packet, unsigned char *rdesc) static int lec_open(struct net_device *dev) { - struct lec_priv *priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev->priv; + struct lec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); netif_start_queue(dev); memset(&priv->stats, 0, sizeof(struct net_device_stats)); @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static void lec_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev) static int lec_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { struct sk_buff *skb2; - struct lec_priv *priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev->priv; + struct lec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); struct lecdatahdr_8023 *lec_h; struct atm_vcc *vcc; struct lec_arp_table *entry; @@ -433,14 +433,14 @@ static int lec_close(struct net_device *dev) */ static struct net_device_stats *lec_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) { - return &((struct lec_priv *)dev->priv)->stats; + return &((struct lec_priv *)netdev_priv(dev))->stats; } static int lec_atm_send(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb) { unsigned long flags; struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)vcc->proto_data; - struct lec_priv *priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev->priv; + struct lec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); struct atmlec_msg *mesg; struct lec_arp_table *entry; int i; @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static void lec_atm_close(struct atm_vcc *vcc) { struct sk_buff *skb; struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)vcc->proto_data; - struct lec_priv *priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev->priv; + struct lec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); priv->lecd = NULL; /* Do something needful? */ @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static void lec_push(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb) { unsigned long flags; struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)vcc->proto_data; - struct lec_priv *priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev->priv; + struct lec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); #if DUMP_PACKETS >0 int i = 0; @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static int lec_vcc_attach(struct atm_vcc *vcc, void __user *arg) vpriv->old_pop = vcc->pop; vcc->user_back = vpriv; vcc->pop = lec_pop; - lec_vcc_added(dev_lec[ioc_data.dev_num]->priv, + lec_vcc_added(netdev_priv(dev_lec[ioc_data.dev_num]), &ioc_data, vcc, vcc->push); vcc->proto_data = dev_lec[ioc_data.dev_num]; vcc->push = lec_push; @@ -870,7 +870,8 @@ static int lec_mcast_attach(struct atm_vcc *vcc, int arg) if (arg < 0 || arg >= MAX_LEC_ITF || !dev_lec[arg]) return -EINVAL; vcc->proto_data = dev_lec[arg]; - return (lec_mcast_make((struct lec_priv *)dev_lec[arg]->priv, vcc)); + return lec_mcast_make((struct lec_priv *)netdev_priv(dev_lec[arg]), + vcc); } /* Initialize device. */ @@ -912,11 +913,11 @@ static int lecd_attach(struct atm_vcc *vcc, int arg) return -EINVAL; } - priv = dev_lec[i]->priv; + priv = netdev_priv(dev_lec[i]); priv->is_trdev = is_trdev; lec_init(dev_lec[i]); } else { - priv = dev_lec[i]->priv; + priv = netdev_priv(dev_lec[i]); if (priv->lecd) return -EADDRINUSE; } @@ -1077,7 +1078,8 @@ static void *lec_itf_walk(struct lec_state *state, loff_t *l) void *v; dev = state->dev ? state->dev : dev_lec[state->itf]; - v = (dev && dev->priv) ? lec_priv_walk(state, l, dev->priv) : NULL; + v = (dev && netdev_priv(dev)) ? + lec_priv_walk(state, l, netdev_priv(dev)) : NULL; if (!v && dev) { dev_put(dev); /* Partial state reset for the next time we get called */ @@ -1239,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __exit lane_module_cleanup(void) for (i = 0; i < MAX_LEC_ITF; i++) { if (dev_lec[i] != NULL) { - priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev_lec[i]->priv; + priv = netdev_priv(dev_lec[i]); unregister_netdev(dev_lec[i]); free_netdev(dev_lec[i]); dev_lec[i] = NULL; @@ -1263,7 +1265,7 @@ static int lane2_resolve(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *dst_mac, int force, u8 **tlvs, u32 *sizeoftlvs) { unsigned long flags; - struct lec_priv *priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev->priv; + struct lec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); struct lec_arp_table *table; struct sk_buff *skb; int retval; @@ -1310,7 +1312,7 @@ static int lane2_associate_req(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *lan_dst, { int retval; struct sk_buff *skb; - struct lec_priv *priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev->priv; + struct lec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); if (compare_ether_addr(lan_dst, dev->dev_addr)) return (0); /* not our mac address */ @@ -1347,7 +1349,7 @@ static void lane2_associate_ind(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *mac_addr, #if 0 int i = 0; #endif - struct lec_priv *priv = (struct lec_priv *)dev->priv; + struct lec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); #if 0 /* * Why have the TLVs in LE_ARP entries * since we do not use them? When you |