summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>2012-11-20 23:25:54 -0200
committerGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>2012-12-03 15:59:10 -0200
commitdc2a0e20fbc85a71c63aa4330b496fda33f6bf80 (patch)
treed4319c396be9da260ea363105b76d2548696bd8f /net
parent2b2fec4d08a0aabe20d2e749cb7978f04217af65 (diff)
Bluetooth: Add missing lock nesting notation
This patch fixes the following report, it happens when accepting rfcomm connections: [ 228.165378] ============================================= [ 228.165378] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 228.165378] 3.7.0-rc1-00536-gc1d5dc4 #120 Tainted: G W [ 228.165378] --------------------------------------------- [ 228.165378] bluetoothd/1341 is trying to acquire lock: [ 228.165378] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0000aa0>] bt_accept_dequeue+0xa0/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] but task is already holding lock: [ 228.165378] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0205118>] rfcomm_sock_accept+0x58/0x2d0 [rfcomm] [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] other info that might help us debug this: [ 228.165378] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] CPU0 [ 228.165378] ---- [ 228.165378] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM); [ 228.165378] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM); [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] May be due to missing lock nesting notation Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
-rw-r--r--net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
index 4ddef57d03a7..ce3f6658f4b2 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int f
long timeo;
int err = 0;
- lock_sock(sk);
+ lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM) {
err = -EINVAL;
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int f
release_sock(sk);
timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
- lock_sock(sk);
+ lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
}
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);