summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorshaohua.li@intel.com <shaohua.li@intel.com>2011-05-06 11:34:41 -0600
committerJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>2011-05-06 11:36:25 -0600
commit3ac0cc4508709d42ec9aa351086c7d38bfc0660c (patch)
tree933d5ab6ff9b0763f36e614962abb5bdcc4a348a /security
parentf3876930952390a31c3a7fd68dd621464a36eb80 (diff)
block: hold queue if flush is running for non-queueable flush drive
In some drives, flush requests are non-queueable. When flush request is running, normal read/write requests can't run. If block layer dispatches such request, driver can't handle it and requeue it. Tejun suggested we can hold the queue when flush is running. This can avoid unnecessary requeue. Also this can improve performance. For example, we have request flush1, write1, flush 2. flush1 is dispatched, then queue is hold, write1 isn't inserted to queue. After flush1 is finished, flush2 will be dispatched. Since disk cache is already clean, flush2 will be finished very soon, so looks like flush2 is folded to flush1. In my test, the queue holding completely solves a regression introduced by commit 53d63e6b0dfb95882ec0219ba6bbd50cde423794: block: make the flush insertion use the tail of the dispatch list It's not a preempt type request, in fact we have to insert it behind requests that do specify INSERT_FRONT. which causes about 20% regression running a sysbench fileio workload. Stable: 2.6.39 only Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions