From 797eaed40e1df4a3b9ece6894a71ce2b568bca38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lachlan McIlroy Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:15:49 +1100 Subject: [XFS] Remove unnecessary assertion Hit this assert because an inode was tagged with XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG but not XFS_IRECLAIMABLE|XFS_IRECLAIM. This is because xfs_iget_cache_hit() first clears XFS_IRECLAIMABLE and then calls __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag() while only holding the pag_ici_lock in read mode so we can race with xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(). Looks like xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag() will do the right thing anyway so just remove the assert. Thanks to Christoph for pointing out where the problem was. Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c index ca5bd2951a84..2ed035354c26 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c @@ -707,8 +707,6 @@ restart: break; } - ASSERT(xfs_iflags_test(ip, (XFS_IRECLAIMABLE|XFS_IRECLAIM))); - /* ignore if already under reclaim */ if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM)) { read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock); -- cgit v1.2.3