From 1d1ea1b723d9f239f736b8cf284327cbbf9d15d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chao Guan Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:58:14 +0000 Subject: ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in. This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan. ACPICA bugzilla 997. References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997 Signed-off-by: Chao Guan Signed-off-by: Bob Moore Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c') diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c index 63c455447481..065b44ae538f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c @@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ acpi_ps_get_arguments(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state, case AML_IF_OP: case AML_ELSE_OP: case AML_WHILE_OP: - /* * Currently supported module-level opcodes are: * IF/ELSE/WHILE. These appear to be the most common, @@ -289,6 +288,7 @@ acpi_ps_get_arguments(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state, default: /* No action for all other opcodes */ + break; } -- cgit v1.2.3