From a5d214f621d47ffb89d294838006d30869050297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Ellenberg Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 11:49:40 +0100 Subject: drbd: remove some very outdated comments Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg --- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/block/drbd') diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h index 2f3501169d68..fff8f790f79d 100644 --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h @@ -879,13 +879,6 @@ enum bm_flag { /* clear is not expected while bitmap is locked for bulk operation */ }; - -/* TODO sort members for performance - * MAYBE group them further */ - -/* THINK maybe we actually want to use the default "event/%s" worker threads - * or similar in linux 2.6, which uses per cpu data and threads. - */ struct drbd_work_queue { struct list_head q; struct semaphore s; /* producers up it, worker down()s it */ -- cgit v1.2.3