From 29bc5b4f73a65ef667df50d5ed474e371471d915 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Toshiyuki Okajima Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:41:22 -0700 Subject: mistaken ext4_inode_bitmap for ext4_block_bitmap In ext4_new_blocks(), one of two ext4_block_bitmap() calls should be ext4_inode_bitmap() call. It is not harmful in normal processing, but it should be fixed. Signed-off-by: Toshiyuki Okajima Cc: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/ext4/balloc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ext4/balloc.c') diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c index 3b64bb16c727..9de54ae48dee 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ allocated: ret_block = grp_alloc_blk + ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group_no); if (in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) || - in_range(ext4_block_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) || + in_range(ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, gdp), ret_block, num) || in_range(ret_block, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp), EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group) || in_range(ret_block + num - 1, ext4_inode_table(sb, gdp), -- cgit v1.2.3