From 83c78eb0425f587a34a6644da79bdcde987dc974 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:50:38 -0400 Subject: NFSv4.1: Don't change the security label as part of open reclaim. The current caching model calls for the security label to be set on first lookup and/or on any subsequent label changes. There is no need to do it as part of an open reclaim. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index d2b4845ecb4d..8dd61eb86f6f 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -1337,8 +1337,6 @@ _nfs4_opendata_reclaim_to_nfs4_state(struct nfs4_opendata *data) if (ret) goto err; - nfs_setsecurity(inode, &data->f_attr, data->f_label); - if (data->o_res.delegation_type != 0) nfs4_opendata_check_deleg(data, state); update_open_stateid(state, &data->o_res.stateid, NULL, -- cgit v1.2.3