From cfdbeeafdbbdbc006f700e92cbad2cb5d4529f3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vincent Cuissard Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:48:38 +0200 Subject: NFC: NCI: Add support of ISO15693 Update nci.h to respect latest NCI specification proposal (stop using proprietary opcodes). Handle ISO15693 parameters in NCI_RF_ACTIVATED_NTF handler. Signed-off-by: Vincent Cuissard Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz --- net/nfc/nci/ntf.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) (limited to 'net/nfc/nci/ntf.c') diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c index df91bb95b12a..25e44cebd60a 100644 --- a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c +++ b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ * The NFC Controller Interface is the communication protocol between an * NFC Controller (NFCC) and a Device Host (DH). * + * Copyright (C) 2014 Marvell International Ltd. * Copyright (C) 2011 Texas Instruments, Inc. * * Written by Ilan Elias @@ -155,6 +156,17 @@ static __u8 *nci_extract_rf_params_nfcf_passive_poll(struct nci_dev *ndev, return data; } +static __u8 *nci_extract_rf_params_nfcv_passive_poll(struct nci_dev *ndev, + struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcv_poll *nfcv_poll, + __u8 *data) +{ + ++data; + nfcv_poll->dsfid = *data++; + memcpy(nfcv_poll->uid, data, NFC_ISO15693_UID_MAXSIZE); + data += NFC_ISO15693_UID_MAXSIZE; + return data; +} + static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct nfc_target *target, __u8 rf_protocol, @@ -164,6 +176,7 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfca_poll *nfca_poll; struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcb_poll *nfcb_poll; struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcf_poll *nfcf_poll; + struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcv_poll *nfcv_poll; __u32 protocol; if (rf_protocol == NCI_RF_PROTOCOL_T1T) @@ -179,6 +192,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, protocol = NFC_PROTO_FELICA_MASK; else if (rf_protocol == NCI_RF_PROTOCOL_NFC_DEP) protocol = NFC_PROTO_NFC_DEP_MASK; + else if (rf_protocol == NCI_RF_PROTOCOL_T5T) + protocol = NFC_PROTO_ISO15693_MASK; else protocol = 0; @@ -213,6 +228,12 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, memcpy(target->sensf_res, nfcf_poll->sensf_res, target->sensf_res_len); } + } else if (rf_tech_and_mode == NCI_NFC_V_PASSIVE_POLL_MODE) { + nfcv_poll = (struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcv_poll *)params; + + target->is_iso15693 = 1; + target->iso15693_dsfid = nfcv_poll->dsfid; + memcpy(target->iso15693_uid, nfcv_poll->uid, NFC_ISO15693_UID_MAXSIZE); } else { pr_err("unsupported rf_tech_and_mode 0x%x\n", rf_tech_and_mode); return -EPROTO; @@ -305,6 +326,11 @@ static void nci_rf_discover_ntf_packet(struct nci_dev *ndev, &(ntf.rf_tech_specific_params.nfcf_poll), data); break; + case NCI_NFC_V_PASSIVE_POLL_MODE: + data = nci_extract_rf_params_nfcv_passive_poll(ndev, + &(ntf.rf_tech_specific_params.nfcv_poll), data); + break; + default: pr_err("unsupported rf_tech_and_mode 0x%x\n", ntf.rf_tech_and_mode); @@ -455,6 +481,11 @@ static void nci_rf_intf_activated_ntf_packet(struct nci_dev *ndev, &(ntf.rf_tech_specific_params.nfcf_poll), data); break; + case NCI_NFC_V_PASSIVE_POLL_MODE: + data = nci_extract_rf_params_nfcv_passive_poll(ndev, + &(ntf.rf_tech_specific_params.nfcv_poll), data); + break; + default: pr_err("unsupported activation_rf_tech_and_mode 0x%x\n", ntf.activation_rf_tech_and_mode); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 9e87f9a9c4c4754508b2c2638fbde9e10c7a103b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christophe Ricard Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 10:28:49 +0200 Subject: NFC: nci: Add support for proprietary RF Protocols In NFC Forum NCI specification, some RF Protocol values are reserved for proprietary use (from 0x80 to 0xfe). Some CLF vendor may need to use one value within this range for specific technology. Furthermore, some CLF may not becompliant with NFC Froum NCI specification 2.0 and therefore will not support RF Protocol value 0x06 for PROTOCOL_T5T as mention in a draft specification and in a recent push. Adding get_rf_protocol handle to the nci_ops structure will help to set the correct technology to target. Signed-off-by: Christophe Ricard Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz --- drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/st21nfcb.c | 10 ++++++++++ include/net/nfc/nci_core.h | 9 +++++---- net/nfc/nci/ntf.c | 9 ++++++++- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/nfc/nci/ntf.c') diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/st21nfcb.c b/drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/st21nfcb.c index 90d37156169e..e72dae816e72 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/st21nfcb.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/st21nfcb.c @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ #define DRIVER_DESC "NCI NFC driver for ST21NFCB" +#define ST21NFCB_NCI1_X_PROPRIETARY_ISO15693 0x83 + static int st21nfcb_nci_open(struct nci_dev *ndev) { struct st21nfcb_nci_info *info = nci_get_drvdata(ndev); @@ -64,10 +66,18 @@ static int st21nfcb_nci_send(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb) return ndlc_send(info->ndlc, skb); } +static __u32 st21nfcb_nci_get_rfprotocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, + __u8 rf_protocol) +{ + return rf_protocol == ST21NFCB_NCI1_X_PROPRIETARY_ISO15693 ? + NFC_PROTO_ISO15693_MASK : 0; +} + static struct nci_ops st21nfcb_nci_ops = { .open = st21nfcb_nci_open, .close = st21nfcb_nci_close, .send = st21nfcb_nci_send, + .get_rfprotocol = st21nfcb_nci_get_rfprotocol, }; int st21nfcb_nci_probe(struct llt_ndlc *ndlc, int phy_headroom, diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h index 1f9a0f5272fe..75d10e625c49 100644 --- a/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h +++ b/include/net/nfc/nci_core.h @@ -64,10 +64,11 @@ enum nci_state { struct nci_dev; struct nci_ops { - int (*open)(struct nci_dev *ndev); - int (*close)(struct nci_dev *ndev); - int (*send)(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb); - int (*setup)(struct nci_dev *ndev); + int (*open)(struct nci_dev *ndev); + int (*close)(struct nci_dev *ndev); + int (*send)(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct sk_buff *skb); + int (*setup)(struct nci_dev *ndev); + __u32 (*get_rfprotocol)(struct nci_dev *ndev, __u8 rf_protocol); }; #define NCI_MAX_SUPPORTED_RF_INTERFACES 4 diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c index 25e44cebd60a..205b35f666db 100644 --- a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c +++ b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c @@ -167,6 +167,13 @@ static __u8 *nci_extract_rf_params_nfcv_passive_poll(struct nci_dev *ndev, return data; } +__u32 nci_get_prop_rf_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, __u8 rf_protocol) +{ + if (ndev->ops->get_rfprotocol) + return ndev->ops->get_rfprotocol(ndev, rf_protocol); + return 0; +} + static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, struct nfc_target *target, __u8 rf_protocol, @@ -195,7 +202,7 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, else if (rf_protocol == NCI_RF_PROTOCOL_T5T) protocol = NFC_PROTO_ISO15693_MASK; else - protocol = 0; + protocol = nci_get_prop_rf_protocol(ndev, rf_protocol); if (!(protocol & ndev->poll_prots)) { pr_err("the target found does not have the desired protocol\n"); -- cgit v1.2.3